How Shared Ownership Transforms Team Performance

Leadership has evolved from a top-down, authoritarian model to a collaborative, inclusive approach. This shift is necessary as industries become more complex and change accelerates. Historically, leaders made all decisions and controlled information flow. This worked in simpler times, but now, adaptability, empathy, and shared ownership are essential.

Today's leaders face unprecedented challenges. Globalization, rapid technological advancements, and increasingly complex organizational structures require leaders who can navigate uncertainty and inspire their teams to innovate and perform at their best. This shift has led to the emergence of new leadership paradigms that prioritize emotional intelligence, collaboration, and continuous learning.

At Integrity, we embrace the operational model of Holacracy to address the modern demands of management structures. Holacracy is an approach to management that distributes decision-making authority across an organization through self-organizing teams. This model utilizes peer leadership and a team approach to all projects, built on transparency, open communication, and shared ownership. By decentralizing power, Holacracy enables organizations to be more agile and responsive, fostering an environment where every team member's voice is heard and valued.

Human beings are social animals. Our brains are wired to desire connection, communication, and collaboration with others, and trust is the connective tissue of any successful team. It allows team members to feel safe, take risks, and express themselves without fear of judgment or retribution. This is where the concept of psychological safety becomes an important piece of effective management.

Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School, is known for her extensive research on psychological safety within teams and workplaces. Her work highlights the importance of creating environments where employees feel safe taking risks, expressing their ideas, and admitting mistakes without fear of retribution. 

Edmondson defines psychological safety as a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking. In a psychologically safe workplace, individuals feel confident that they can speak up, offer ideas, ask questions, and acknowledge mistakes without the fear of being humiliated, ignored, or punished.

Key Components of Psychological Safety:

• Interpersonal Trust: Team members trust that their colleagues will not embarrass or punish them for admitting a mistake, asking a question, or offering a new idea.
  
  
• Respect for Each Other: There is mutual respect among team members, which fosters open and honest communication.
  ‍
• Open Communication: There is a culture of openness where team members feel free to share their thoughts and opinions.
  
  
• Supportive Leadership: Leaders play a critical role in establishing and maintaining psychological safety by modeling inclusive and supportive behaviors.

In her book "The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth," Edmondson illustrates the importance and impact of psychological safety using Google’s Project Aristotle as an example. The project, named after the philosopher Aristotle who famously said, “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts,” aimed to uncover the key dynamics that distinguish successful teams from others.

After studying hundreds of Google’s teams and analyzing a vast amount of data, the researchers discovered that psychological safety was the most critical factor contributing to team effectiveness. This finding was surprising, as it surpassed other important factors, such as the team members' collective intelligence, educational backgrounds, or individual skills.

Instead, group norms—unwritten rules and behaviors that govern how team members interact—were found to be the most distinguishing factor.

The most successful teams shared two main behaviors:

• Equality in Conversation Turn-Taking: Team members spoke in roughly the same proportion, ensuring that everyone had an opportunity to contribute.
  
  
• High Social Sensitivity: Team members were skilled at intuiting how others felt based on nonverbal cues and tone of voice, fostering a supportive environment.

One of the key practices implemented at Google to enhance psychological safety was “blameless post-mortems.” After any project or incident, teams conducted reviews focused on understanding what happened and how to improve rather than assigning blame. The analysis was driven by data, and a scientific method mindset, which encourages a culture of working together to discover insights and an agreement that growth is an evolutionary process that is iterative and involves learning from mistakes. 

In her book, Edmondson outlines several strategies for leaders to foster psychological safety in their teams:

• Frame the Work as a Learning Problem, Not an Execution Problem: Leaders should emphasize that the work involves uncertainty and interdependence and requires everyone’s input and learning to achieve the best outcomes.
  ‍
• Acknowledge Your Own Fallibility: Leaders should model vulnerability by admitting their own mistakes and uncertainties. This sets the tone for others to do the same.
  
  
• Model Curiosity and Ask Questions: Leaders should actively seek input from team members by asking questions and showing genuine interest in their perspectives. This encourages a culture of open dialogue.
  ‍
• Respond Productively to Feedback and Concerns: When team members speak up, leaders should respond positively, even if the feedback is critical. This reinforces the belief that speaking up is valued.
  ‍
• Create Structures and Processes for Inclusion: Implement regular team meetings, feedback sessions, and other structures that encourage participation from all team members.

The fusion of management models like Holacracy with principles like psychological safety isn't just a strategy—it's a revolution in leadership. It is redefining how we view power and collaboration. By dismantling hierarchical barriers and cultivating a culture of trust and transparency, modern leaders can unlock the full potential of their teams. The future of leadership isn't about who holds the power—it's about how we share it.

‍